同路文档网

首页 > 专题范文 > 公文范文 > / 正文

美国医疗行业:消费者对恢复选择程序看法【精选推荐】

2022-06-28 16:10:03 来源:网友投稿

下面是小编为大家整理的美国医疗行业:消费者对恢复选择程序看法【精选推荐】,供大家参考。

美国医疗行业:消费者对恢复选择程序看法【精选推荐】

 

 North America Equity Research May 2020

 US Healthcare What Consumers Are Saying About Resuming Elective Procedures

  Medical Supplies & Devices Robbie Marcus, CFA AC

 +1 212 622 6657 Robert.j.marcus@jpmorgan.com

 HC Technology & Distribution Lisa Gill AC

 +1 212 622 6466 Lisa.c.gill@jpmorgan.com

 HC Facilities & Managed Care Gary Taylor AC

 +1 212 622 6600 Gary.taylor@jpmorgan.com

  Life Science Tools & Diagnostics Tycho Peterson AC

 +1 212 622 6568 Tycho.peterson@jpmorgan.com

 European MedTech & Services David Adlington AC

 207 134 5828 David.adlington@jpmorgan.com| See the end pages of this presentation for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures. J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

 2

   “ “Goldilocks Prevails” - 72% of those with a deferred medical procedure stated they were willing to undergo the procedure either “now” or “within a few months as crisis eases”.  Hospitals & Providers: This seems fairly bullish for hospitals off the down 50% April lows; particularly given the responses were collected over 5/5-5/11/20 as states were just beginning to re-open social movement and elective procedures.  Managed Care: The data is still plenty benign for managed care medical loss ratios (MLR); 38% of previously- scheduled cases are not willing to come back until there is treatment or vaccine development.  Two modest surprises from this same subset of patients: 1) no material skew of outpatient vs inpatient (more positive for hospitals vs ASCs than we would have guessed), and 2) a slight skew of government vs commercial insurance (slightly worse returning payor mix for hospitals than we would have guessed given frailty of senior population vs younger commercial population). Managed

 Care

 &

 Healthcare

 Facilities

  With more than a third of respondents planning to wait until a treatment or vaccine becomes available, this reaffirms our view that COVID-19 will have lasting impacts well-beyond 2Q20  Disruptions to the pipeline of patients could also stifle the recovery, with only 36% of patients currently seeing a physician either in-person or virtually. MedTech

 

 Elective procedure pushouts and hospital capex spending continue to look bleak amidst the pandemic (for more color on the latter, see our hospital capex survey) 

 We continue to recommend select exposure. In particular, we would avoid some dental names in light of a slower recovery in elective procedures (i.e. XRAY), as well as radiation oncology (i.e., VAR, ARAY), which remains prone to a more lasting hospital capex budget freeze and changing reimbursement, while we note that ISRG plans to use the balance sheet aggressively to place capital under an operating lease model, which should offer some cushion. Lastly, we remain constructive on HOLX, in light of the COVID-19 diagnostic tailwinds, among other things. 

 Outside of med tech and dental, we remain positive (and Overweight) on several diversified life science tools names (AVTR, DHR), smid cap growth companies (ADPT, GH, NTRA, TXG) and CRO/CDMOs (CRL, CTLT, IQV, PPD). We remain Underweight on LMNX, MYGN, QDEL, VAR and WAT. Life

 Science

 Tools

 &

 Diagnostics

  Healthcare

 Services

   Telehealth:

  We

 believe

 the

 results

 are

 broadly

 bullish

 as

 it

 relates

 to

 continued

 adoption

 of

 telehealth.

  While

 32%

 of total

 respondents

 have

 had

 a

 telehealth

 consult

 in

 the

 past,

 69%

 of

 total

 respondents

 indicated

 they

 would

 be

 willing to

 have

 a

 telehealth

 consult

 in

 the

 future.

  Satisfaction

 appears

 high,

 with

 79%

 of

 respondents

 that

 have

 had

 a telehealth

 consult

 in

 the

 past

 indicating

 that

 they

 would

 be

 willing

 to

 do

 it

 again

 in

 the

 future.

 We

 believe

 these

 results reinforce

 our

 positive

 views

 on

 Teladoc

 Health

 (TDOC/OW)

 and

 One

 Medical

 (ONEM/OW),

 as

 new

 users

 and

 positive experiences

 should

 lead

 to

 increasing

 comfort

 around

 future

 use

 of

 telehealth

 across

 a

 range

 of

 conditions.  Clinical

 Labs:

 61%

 of

 respondents

 were

 not

 willing

 to

 wait

 more

 than

 3

 months

 to

 have

 a

 test

 performed,

 which

 we view

 as

 a

 positive

 take

 for

 the

 labs,

 which

 saw

 a

 50-60%

 decline

 in

 volumes

 from

 healthcare

 utilization

 deferrals. Digging

 further

 into

 the

 question,

 84%

 of

 respondents

 would

 not

 be

 willing

 to

 wait

 more

 than

 6

 months

 from

 the

 time of

 the

 survey

 to

 defer

 testing.

  This

 is

 consistent

 with

 commentary

 they

 have

 started

 to

 see

 volumes

 return

 faster

 and to

 a

 greater

 extent

 than

 they

 had

 anticipated,

 and

 would

 represent

 upside

 to

 our

 models.  Healthcare

 IT:

 Within

 Healthcare

 IT,

 Change

 Healthcare,

 Progyny,

 and

 Phreesia

 have

 the

 largest

 utilization

 exposure at

 40-50%,

 55%

 and

 100%

 respectively.

  Looking

 at

 the

 survey

 results,

 55%

 of

 respondents

 who

 did

 not

 have

 a procedure

 deferred

 would

 be

 willing

 to

 undergo

 a

 medical

 procedure

 within

 a

 few

 months,

 while

 72%

 of

 those

 that had

 deferred

 procedures

 would

 be

 willing

 to

 return.

  This

 echoes

 commentary

 from

 1Q

 calls

 around

 pent-up

 demand, which

 we

 view

 as

 favorable

 to

 our

 models. 

  European

 MedTech

   Orthopedics

 –

 Smith

 &

 Nephew,

 Medacta 

 S&N

 has

 been

 relatively

 cautious

 on

 pace

 of

 near

 term

 rebound

 –

 confirmed

 by

 this

 survey.

 Also

 wary

 of increased

 pricing

 pressure

 in

 near

 to

 mid-term.

 Medacta

 –

 has

 indicated

 it

 expects

 to

 see

 earlier

 demand

 come back

 into

 ASCs,

 with

 hospitals

 coming

 back

 later

 (not

 confirmed

 by

 the

 survey)  Dental – Straumann 

 The key data point on dental implants was that procedures have been deferred rather than cancelled, and are almost all being rescheduled for next 3-6 months. What this survey doesn’t capture is how any economic impact might influence future decisions  Cardiovascular – Philips, Getinge 

 While a relatively small part of Philips, the CV business is profitable (particularly the consumables) and high growth and was hit hard on late Q1/early Q2. An early rebound is probably factored into expectations and this looks to be confirmed by the survey  Surgical Urology – Coloplast 

 Coloplast cut guidance for this year, almost exclusively citing weakness in their surgical urology business - backed up by the survey, with no respondents who had had an endoscopy or urology procedure deferred saying they would get a procedure done immediately if possible, with 54% indicating that they would defer it by 6 months or longer. Hopes of early rebound seem unlikely  Hospital capex – Philips, Siemens Healthineers, Elekta, Getinge 

 While not directly assessed as part of this survey, a slower patient rebound likely has implications for Hospital capex budgets, something we have addressed directly with our hospital capex survey 

  Demographic

 Selection

 Criteria

  We conducted a survey of 544 patients through Survey Monkey with the following criteria:  Data was collected between May 5-11, 2020  Respondents were selected so that ~2/3 were over the age of 65 and ~1/3 under the age of 65  We expected higher healthcare system utilization among an older demographic  Respondents were selected so that ~1/2 of patients had a procedure deferred due to disruptions from COVID-19, and ~1/2 who had not had a procedure deferred.  Patients didn’t have to answer every question, that’s the reason for minor discrepancies in sample sizes. We did not edit or exclude and responses. 

 (n=247) 9%

 14%

  62%

 15%

 have? (n=

 65 6%

 9%

 28%

 52%

 2%

  3%

 217)

  ot looking 1%

 3%

  15%

 81%

  Patient

 Demographics

 of

 Those

 With

 a

 Deferred

 Procedure

  The survey criteria was set so as to select for older patients who are more likely to undergo regular medical procedures

  Respondents were selected so that ~2/3 were over the age of 65   52% of respondents are retired   81% of respondents are covered by either Medicare or Medicaid 

 Q: What is your age? (n=257) Q: What is your employment status? What type of healthcare insurance do you

 Under 30

  Part-time Self-employed I do not have health insurance Private/employer sponsored healthcare Not sure, but have health insurance

 30-45

 Older than 65

  46-

 Full-time Retired

  Public/Medicare/M edicaid

  Furloughed Not employed, n

  6

 (n=250) 8%

 13%

 60%

 19%

 have? (n=255) 5% 8%

 19%

  68%

 Private

 Not sure, but 30-45 have health insurance

 I 5%

 2%

 11%

 58%

 19%

  1%

 5%

  Patient

 Demographics

 of

 Those

 Without

 a

 Deferred

 Procedure

  The survey criteria was set so as to select for older patients who are more likely to undergo regular medical procedures

  60% of respondents were over the age of 65   58% of respondents were retired   68% of respondents are covered by either Medicare or Medicaid 

 Q: What is your age? (n=279) Q: What is your employment status? What type of healthcare insurance do you

 Under 30

 Part-time Self-employed /employer sponsored healthcare

  Older than 65

  46-65 Other

  Full-time

 Retired

 do not have health insurance

 Public/Medicare/Medicaid

 Furloughed

 Not employed, not looking

  7

 (N=544 Total Respondents; 100% of Total)

 Deferral

 of

 Medical

 Procedures

  Q: Did you have a medical procedure that was delayed or cancelled due to COVID-19?

  Type

 of

 Health

 Insurance

   TAKEAWAY :

 The

 payor

 mix

 breakdown

 between

 sample

 cohorts

 is

 approximately

 similar.

 Q: Of those who did not have a procedure deferred, what insurance do you have? (N=280 Total Respondents; 51% of Total) Q: Of those who did have a procedure deferred, what insurance do you have? (N=264 Total Respondents; 49% of Total)

  Earliest

 Timeframe

 Willing

 to

 Undergo

 a

 Medical

 Procedure

  TAKEAWAY :

 Patients

 who

 did

 have

 a

 procedure

 deferred

 are

 more

 willing

 to

 have

 a

 procedure

 “now” (32%

 vs

 20%).

 ...

推荐访问:美国医疗行业:消费者对恢复选择程序看法 美国 看法 消费者

搜索